-
Part 1 | Session 15 Cost-Effectiveness of Urea Excipient-Based DCBs for CLTI
-
Part 1 | Session 16 The CLariTI Study: Natural Progression of CLTI
-
Part 1 | Session 17 PAD in Germany 2009-2018 With Dr Rammos
-
Part 1 | Session 18 LINC 22: IN.PACT Global Study 5-Y Diabetic & Gender Subgroup Outcomes
-
Part 1 | Session 19 Patient Selection in NIVL and Preventing Migration in Venous Stenting
-
Part 1 | Session 1 GPX Embolic Device In Peripheral Applications
-
Part 1 | Session 2 B-CLEAR Registry: Timing of TEVAR in Type B Aortic Dissection
-
Part 1 | Session 4 Cre8™ BTK Clinical Results in Complex BTK Patients
-
Part 1 | Session 5 AVF Formation with Adjuvant Endovascular Maturation
-
Part 1 | Session 6 Long-Term Results of Supera in AVF Junta-Anastomosis
-
Part 1 | Session 7 SirPAD RCT: Sirolimus-Coated DCBs in Pts with PAD
-
Part 1 | Session 8 PRELUDE-BTK With Dr Lichtenberg: Serranator® PTA in Pts With PAD
-
Part 1 | Session 9 PRIZER Study: Renzan™ Stent in Pts With PAD
-
Part 1 | Session 10 Auryon-SCE: Real-World Cohort Shows Promising Freedom from TLR at 6M
-
Part 1 | Session 11 JET-RANGER: Jetstream Atherectomy & DCB In Pts With Complex Calcified Lesions
-
Part 1 | Session 12 FLEX RCT: Micro-Incision prior to PTA in Pts With AVF
-
Part 1 | Session 13 BioMimics 3D Stent: Safety and Efficacy in Real-World Patients
Short, accessible Expert Interviews will be available with select faculty focusing on the results, applicability, and impact on future research.
More from this programme
Part 1
Expert Interviews
Faculty Biographies
Michael Lichtenberg
Chief Medical Officer and Director of the Angiology Department and Vascular Center
Michael Lichtenberg, MD, FESC is the Chief Medical Officer and Director of the Angiology Department and Vascular Center at the Arnsberg Clinic in Arnsberg, Germany.
Dr Lichtenberg earned his medical degree from the Heinrich-Heine Medical University of Dusseldorf, and also studied at the Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana and the Texas Heart Institute in Houston, Texas.
As esteemed Interventional Angiologist with 20 years of experience in endovascular interventions, Dr Lichtenberg was elected to serve as Managing Director of the German Society for Angiology in 2017. In 2019, he was elected to serve as the society’s President.
Dr Lichtenberg’s areas of clinical interest include deep venous intervention, peripheral artery disease, peripheral thrombosis and atherosclerosis.
In addition to his day-to-day work in interventional care, his main interest is the evaluation of new devices, techniques and procedures for the intervention of…
Transcript
Studied Device in This Analysis
So the P-MAX study is a typical post-marketing study, analysing the safety and efficacy of the Aspirex thrombectomy system. So we are dealing with mechanical thrombectomy for different indications, analysing safety and efficacy for this device, including acute iliofemoral DVT, native iliofemoral DVT, in-stent DVT, and upper limb DVT.
Study Background
So the background is definitely the shift from catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute thrombosis to a mechanical thrombectomy, meaning, with these new devices which we have now, like the Aspirex device, we have a very efficient tool to treat patients with acute DVT, but also a very safe tool, meaning we don't need any additional thrombolysis, meaning avoiding bleeding complication, long stay of the patient in the hospital, and no intensive care unit stay.
Study Design and Patient Population
So, 81 patients were treated in this post-marketing, multicenter prospective registry. So it was a very open registry, nearly no exclusion or inclusion criteria, therefore we can call it an all-comers registry, so every patient with acute or subacute iliofemoral DVT, upper limb DVT, could have been included in this trial, and that's why we were so successful to include so many patients in this registry.
Key Results
So the key results are very simple. Mechanical thrombectomy using the Aspirex device is very efficient and safe. So we did not have any bleeding complications, patient could be sent home very soon after the intervention, and we could remove significant amount of the thrombus in most of these patients, meaning technical success, and procedural success was close to 100% with the Aspirex mechanical thrombectomy device.
Further Study
So the next step is definitely to implement this mechanical thrombectomy more and more into daily routine practice. We are still seeing a lot of catheter-directed thrombolysis in the centers for treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT. Again, I don't think that CDT therapy is still an option in terms of efficacy and safety. We have very promising and effective mechanical thrombectomy devices on the market now.